Posts
Good looks and the Trump campaign
2 weeks ago
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Traitor of the Week
I'm starting a new weekly post entitled "Traitor of the Week", in which YOU get to put in your two cents about which very special Benedict Arnold we should nominate for the "Hall of Shame". Feel free to fire away!
Monday, April 27, 2009
Who Are They?
Who Are They? And Where are “They” taking us?
The meteoric rise to the Presidency by Barack Hussein Obama was not the result of one candidate, unilaterally, on his own merit, appealing to an overwhelming majority of Americans.
No, he was bought, paid for, tailored, and groomed as a “package”. He was placed on a pedestal, candy coated, air-brushed and given scripts in the form of teleprompters. It did not matter that he had no true “roots” in traditional values and ideals of America. It did not matter that he had no experience in national defense, economics or foreign affairs. It did not matter that all his past associates were of dubious character, or that he himself was a product of the Chicago political “pay to play” machinery. It did not matter that he was a member of the socialist party of Illinois. It did not matter that he hid all of his birth, educational, and medical records from view, a process that began long before he announced his candidacy. It did not matter that the mainstream media refused to question any of these issues. It did not matter that he said he would cut the Department of Defense budget and eliminate missile defense programs in the face of a reawakening of the Russian bear. It did not matter that he said he wanted an internal security force as strong as the US military establishment. It did not matter that he told America he was going to redistribute wealth and give part of the wealth to those who would not, or could not work to achieve financial success. It did not matter that he began getting some $35 million in contributions from Wall Street and big finance in 1998, well before he even announced a candidacy for a national office. It did not matter that he sat in a church and listened to vitriolic diatribes about black liberation theology for twenty years. No it did not matter because he was elected.
Today, it does not matter that the national debt may go to $20 Trillion in the next decade. It does not matter that the new administration is doing everything it can to attack and dilute the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. It does not matter that universal health care will be foisted on the citizenry with the attendant delays in treatment for patients. It does not matter that the administration has abandoned Israel. It does not matter that the current resident of the White House has apologized to the entire world for the past “sins” of the United States. It does not matter that doctors and nurses who object to certain procedures on religious and moral grounds will be forced to perform those procedures or be guilty of breaking the law. It does not matter that he wants to start sex education at the age of five. It does not matter that the Department of Homeland Security has labeled anti-abortionists and military veterans as potential radical right-wing terrorists. It does not matter that the radical Islamic world has been told we are not at war with them. None of this matters because sixty percent of Americans, according to the “polls” still think he is doing a “good job”.
What does matter are the answers to two questions. Who are “they” who sold him to the United States? And, where are “they” taking the Republic? These two questions will only be answered if we remain awake and keep them on the plate in front of us. If we take our eyes off that plate, because the mainstream media diverts our attention to the “issue” or “crisis of the day”, we will arrive at an unknown destination and the Republic and Constitution will be things of the past. In addition to paying attention, we must take on a mode of critical thinking that is diametrically opposed to the way a patriotic American would normally think. That is, we must change roles and become one of “them”. Much has been written about the similarities between the rise of Hitler and the rise of Barack. But, what of the differences? They are very significant and worthy of consideration.
Hitler had to motivate the German people by calling for new unity and telling them they could be “one people”, a powerful country again, with a powerful military. He wanted a unified effort based on pride in their Teutonic heritage. Now, this is precisely the opposite of what Barack has done and continues to do. He wants to splinter and divide the United States militarily, religiously, morally and spiritually. He wants nothing of patriotism, a strong military or a surge in national pride. He wants nothing of the strength of a middle class or small business which is the economic power of the country. During his entire campaign, he never alluded to these qualities, characteristics or goals. Why not? It is as if he is dividing and weakening the country and preparing it for some sort of yard sale or takeover. The Republic is being tenderized, marinated and prepared for cooking. The Constitution is being bent, folded, stapled and mutilated. Why? And, for whom?
The meteoric rise to the Presidency by Barack Hussein Obama was not the result of one candidate, unilaterally, on his own merit, appealing to an overwhelming majority of Americans.
No, he was bought, paid for, tailored, and groomed as a “package”. He was placed on a pedestal, candy coated, air-brushed and given scripts in the form of teleprompters. It did not matter that he had no true “roots” in traditional values and ideals of America. It did not matter that he had no experience in national defense, economics or foreign affairs. It did not matter that all his past associates were of dubious character, or that he himself was a product of the Chicago political “pay to play” machinery. It did not matter that he was a member of the socialist party of Illinois. It did not matter that he hid all of his birth, educational, and medical records from view, a process that began long before he announced his candidacy. It did not matter that the mainstream media refused to question any of these issues. It did not matter that he said he would cut the Department of Defense budget and eliminate missile defense programs in the face of a reawakening of the Russian bear. It did not matter that he said he wanted an internal security force as strong as the US military establishment. It did not matter that he told America he was going to redistribute wealth and give part of the wealth to those who would not, or could not work to achieve financial success. It did not matter that he began getting some $35 million in contributions from Wall Street and big finance in 1998, well before he even announced a candidacy for a national office. It did not matter that he sat in a church and listened to vitriolic diatribes about black liberation theology for twenty years. No it did not matter because he was elected.
Today, it does not matter that the national debt may go to $20 Trillion in the next decade. It does not matter that the new administration is doing everything it can to attack and dilute the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. It does not matter that universal health care will be foisted on the citizenry with the attendant delays in treatment for patients. It does not matter that the administration has abandoned Israel. It does not matter that the current resident of the White House has apologized to the entire world for the past “sins” of the United States. It does not matter that doctors and nurses who object to certain procedures on religious and moral grounds will be forced to perform those procedures or be guilty of breaking the law. It does not matter that he wants to start sex education at the age of five. It does not matter that the Department of Homeland Security has labeled anti-abortionists and military veterans as potential radical right-wing terrorists. It does not matter that the radical Islamic world has been told we are not at war with them. None of this matters because sixty percent of Americans, according to the “polls” still think he is doing a “good job”.
What does matter are the answers to two questions. Who are “they” who sold him to the United States? And, where are “they” taking the Republic? These two questions will only be answered if we remain awake and keep them on the plate in front of us. If we take our eyes off that plate, because the mainstream media diverts our attention to the “issue” or “crisis of the day”, we will arrive at an unknown destination and the Republic and Constitution will be things of the past. In addition to paying attention, we must take on a mode of critical thinking that is diametrically opposed to the way a patriotic American would normally think. That is, we must change roles and become one of “them”. Much has been written about the similarities between the rise of Hitler and the rise of Barack. But, what of the differences? They are very significant and worthy of consideration.
Hitler had to motivate the German people by calling for new unity and telling them they could be “one people”, a powerful country again, with a powerful military. He wanted a unified effort based on pride in their Teutonic heritage. Now, this is precisely the opposite of what Barack has done and continues to do. He wants to splinter and divide the United States militarily, religiously, morally and spiritually. He wants nothing of patriotism, a strong military or a surge in national pride. He wants nothing of the strength of a middle class or small business which is the economic power of the country. During his entire campaign, he never alluded to these qualities, characteristics or goals. Why not? It is as if he is dividing and weakening the country and preparing it for some sort of yard sale or takeover. The Republic is being tenderized, marinated and prepared for cooking. The Constitution is being bent, folded, stapled and mutilated. Why? And, for whom?
Shut Up America!
Looks like the First Amendment may be set to take another blow by the new administration. First, peaceful activists were marginalized as right wing extremists. Now the radio airwaves are under threat. I told you last fall, but you didn't listen. In Obama's world, Dissent will NOT be tolerated!
MEDIA MATTERS
Nation's talkers meet on 'imminent threat'
Top hosts hold unprecedented summit to stop efforts at government control
Posted: April 26, 2009
11:09 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
WASHINGTON – Putting aside their own competitive interests, representatives of more than two dozen of the nation's top talk shows held an unprecedented private meeting over the weekend to brainstorm strategies against what they agreed are government plans by to squelch critical political speech on radio.
Organized by Brad O'Leary, author of the new book, "Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech," and Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, the group chose one attendee to be spokesman and chairman of the coalition – syndicated host Roger Hedgecock of San Diego.
A daylong discussion today focused on what was described as the "imminent threat" of so-called "localism" requirements that will subject radio programming to the review by panels of community activists who will evaluate station content. These panels will be empowered to make recommendations for programming changes and challenge at the Federal Communications Commission the licenses renewals of stations that don't heed their advice.
Last month, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., submitted an amendment to the D.C. Voting Bill which would require the FCC to "encourage and promote diversity in ... media ownership" and reaffirm FCC authority to mandate the presentation "of opposing points of view on issues of public importance."
Also of concern to the hosts and producers gathered in the nation's capital was a decision last week by Clear Channel, the nation's largest owner of radio stations, to mandate the creation of local advisory boards by June at all of its properties. The move was seen as pre-emptive as the industry anticipates an FCC stacked with Barack Obama appointees will soon require stations to answer to panels of community activists.
It's time to put up or shut up, America. Literally. Get the book that shows how to fight the assault on your freedom of speech!
In February, the FCC floated several proposals to require stations to better serve local communities, including establishing community advisory boards to consult stations on programming.
"We are materially increasing our commitment to community programming, increasing our accountability and broadening our public-service contributions in every local market we serve," said John Hogan, president and chief executive officer of Clear Channel. "We believe when radio focuses on servicing local communities, it is radio at its finest."
Read Here
MEDIA MATTERS
Nation's talkers meet on 'imminent threat'
Top hosts hold unprecedented summit to stop efforts at government control
Posted: April 26, 2009
11:09 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
WASHINGTON – Putting aside their own competitive interests, representatives of more than two dozen of the nation's top talk shows held an unprecedented private meeting over the weekend to brainstorm strategies against what they agreed are government plans by to squelch critical political speech on radio.
Organized by Brad O'Leary, author of the new book, "Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech," and Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, the group chose one attendee to be spokesman and chairman of the coalition – syndicated host Roger Hedgecock of San Diego.
A daylong discussion today focused on what was described as the "imminent threat" of so-called "localism" requirements that will subject radio programming to the review by panels of community activists who will evaluate station content. These panels will be empowered to make recommendations for programming changes and challenge at the Federal Communications Commission the licenses renewals of stations that don't heed their advice.
Last month, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., submitted an amendment to the D.C. Voting Bill which would require the FCC to "encourage and promote diversity in ... media ownership" and reaffirm FCC authority to mandate the presentation "of opposing points of view on issues of public importance."
Also of concern to the hosts and producers gathered in the nation's capital was a decision last week by Clear Channel, the nation's largest owner of radio stations, to mandate the creation of local advisory boards by June at all of its properties. The move was seen as pre-emptive as the industry anticipates an FCC stacked with Barack Obama appointees will soon require stations to answer to panels of community activists.
It's time to put up or shut up, America. Literally. Get the book that shows how to fight the assault on your freedom of speech!
In February, the FCC floated several proposals to require stations to better serve local communities, including establishing community advisory boards to consult stations on programming.
"We are materially increasing our commitment to community programming, increasing our accountability and broadening our public-service contributions in every local market we serve," said John Hogan, president and chief executive officer of Clear Channel. "We believe when radio focuses on servicing local communities, it is radio at its finest."
Read Here
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Obama's Associations with Rogues
Look at the date of this editorial in Investor's Business Daily- March of LAST year. Once again, the MSM has been outed as an accomplice in the suppression of critical information about the clearly questionable associations of Obama, even before he moved ahead in the Democratic primary race. No wonder he and Chavez were so cozy this past week. Apparently their allegiance goes back farther than most of us were aware. I would really like to know what the heck is really going on.
Obama And FARC
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, March 07, 2008 4:20 PM PT
Terrorism: The March 1 death strike by the Colombian army against FARC warlord Raul Reyes broke open a trove of contacts in his computer. So why did the name of Barack Obama turn up there?
Related Topics: Election 2008 | Latin America & Caribbean
Admittedly, it pales compared with other material from the dead thug's computer — such as FARC efforts to obtain uranium or Hugo Chavez's $300 million support.
But the little Obama reference within the 15 FARC letters released by the Colombian government signals a disturbing pattern of contacts with rogue actors. It's not the first time, and Obama has yet to distance himself.
In a Feb. 28 letter, FARC chieftain Raul Reyes cheerily reported to his inner circle that he met "two gringos" who assured him "the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support 'Plan Colombia' nor will he sign the TLC (Free Trade Agreement)."
Aside from some interesting possibilities about who these "gringos" are — a congressional delegation did visit Ecuador and an international leftist "congress" was held in Quito around this time — the real question is why anyone secretly consorting with FARC would be able to speak for presidential candidate Obama.
Obama hasn't said a whole lot about Colombia other than to criticize President Bush's good relations with President Uribe. With this correspondence suggesting that FARC knows what he thinks, maybe the American voters have a right to know what he thinks, too. Five questions come to mind:
1. Is it true Obama would cut off Plan Colombia military aid to our ally, which would serve the terrorist group FARC's interests?
2. Does Obama still oppose a free trade agreement for Colombia, even though that puts him on the same side as FARC in the debate?
3. Does Obama know or care that one of his staffers or supporters is claiming to disclose his positions in secret meetings with FARC terrorists outside government channels?
4. Can he tell us why his supporters would pass on such information to terrorists, and what he or she could gain from it?
5. Will Obama, as president, treat FARC as the serious terrorists they are, given that they still hold three Americans hostage?
These aren't idle "gotcha" questions, by the way. Based on his campaign so far, Obama favors meeting and negotiating with rogue leaders without preconditions, passing secret messages to foreign countries at odds with his public positions and tolerating Che-flag wielding leftists among his supporters who advance a radical agenda in his name.
Now that FARC seems to have an inside line to Obama's campaign, maybe he ought to come tell voters what he really stands for.
Obama And FARC
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, March 07, 2008 4:20 PM PT
Terrorism: The March 1 death strike by the Colombian army against FARC warlord Raul Reyes broke open a trove of contacts in his computer. So why did the name of Barack Obama turn up there?
Related Topics: Election 2008 | Latin America & Caribbean
Admittedly, it pales compared with other material from the dead thug's computer — such as FARC efforts to obtain uranium or Hugo Chavez's $300 million support.
But the little Obama reference within the 15 FARC letters released by the Colombian government signals a disturbing pattern of contacts with rogue actors. It's not the first time, and Obama has yet to distance himself.
In a Feb. 28 letter, FARC chieftain Raul Reyes cheerily reported to his inner circle that he met "two gringos" who assured him "the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support 'Plan Colombia' nor will he sign the TLC (Free Trade Agreement)."
Aside from some interesting possibilities about who these "gringos" are — a congressional delegation did visit Ecuador and an international leftist "congress" was held in Quito around this time — the real question is why anyone secretly consorting with FARC would be able to speak for presidential candidate Obama.
Obama hasn't said a whole lot about Colombia other than to criticize President Bush's good relations with President Uribe. With this correspondence suggesting that FARC knows what he thinks, maybe the American voters have a right to know what he thinks, too. Five questions come to mind:
1. Is it true Obama would cut off Plan Colombia military aid to our ally, which would serve the terrorist group FARC's interests?
2. Does Obama still oppose a free trade agreement for Colombia, even though that puts him on the same side as FARC in the debate?
3. Does Obama know or care that one of his staffers or supporters is claiming to disclose his positions in secret meetings with FARC terrorists outside government channels?
4. Can he tell us why his supporters would pass on such information to terrorists, and what he or she could gain from it?
5. Will Obama, as president, treat FARC as the serious terrorists they are, given that they still hold three Americans hostage?
These aren't idle "gotcha" questions, by the way. Based on his campaign so far, Obama favors meeting and negotiating with rogue leaders without preconditions, passing secret messages to foreign countries at odds with his public positions and tolerating Che-flag wielding leftists among his supporters who advance a radical agenda in his name.
Now that FARC seems to have an inside line to Obama's campaign, maybe he ought to come tell voters what he really stands for.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
New Preamble to the Constitution
Received this today and thought it was a good reminder to those who don't quite get it.
"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetter's. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."
ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth.. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.
ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended.. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.
ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair..
ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.
ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful. (AMEN!)
ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.
ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from! (Lastly....)
ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!
"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetter's. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."
ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth.. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.
ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended.. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.
ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair..
ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.
ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful. (AMEN!)
ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.
ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from! (Lastly....)
ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!
Monday, April 20, 2009
Situational Awareness
From the lack of support of this administration for Israel, to the release of secret CIA "torture" documents (of which most techniques we encountered as kids), to the appeasement of despots throughout the world, the Obama administration puts us all at great peril. Think about the difference between the mental states, or situational awareness if you will, of the United States citizenry and that of the Israelis.
Here in the US, the vast majority of the citizens know absolutely nothing of the several major threats to our survival. For the most part, the guy, gal, or "other", on the street is so focused on the economic "tree" that he does not see the global economic "forest". It is like a complete idiot facing one huge domino while he wonders what that crashing sound is off in the distance that keeps getting louder. He has a warm fuzzy feeling because he thinks he is being well served by the new resident of the White House. And that graphic picture holds true for, not just the economic frailty, but the country's susceptibility to a Mexican debacle, or a Muslim terrorist attack. Few people have bothered to think through the scenarios far enough to see what an
Israeli attack on Iran could do within hours, or a day or two, here. And as to the rape of the Constitution, and the socialization of the country by big government takeovers and expanded meddling, the citizens are mental paraplegics molded by an educational system designed to make them fat, dumb and happy in their stupidity.
Psychologically, like a group of sheep being fattened on green grass, we have taken totally for granted, the availability of food, water, electricity, gas and entertainment from the "idiot box". For the most part, few remember, with any clarity, the initial chaos of 9/11, the attack on the Pentagon and the uncertainty as to who the attackers really were. Now, we have people in power who will use a similar crisis to their advantage very quickly. Whether it be by emergency powers, martial law, or confiscation of firearms, they are willing to make the crisis work toward the fulfillment of their satanic agenda. Yes, the
children will run in a panic to "daddy" for protection, not even seeing the ax he holds behind his back.
On the other hand, you have every Israeli citizen ready, at a moment's notice, to do their part in a well-rehearsed and clearly prepared plan for survival. What a difference it makes when your very existence is at stake.
This country badly needs an attitude adjustment. Unfortunately, those who should be reporting on the possible consequences of these several scenarios, are still dancing with the prom king, who was elected by an ignorant student body who thought it would be cool to have someone a "little different" as Prom King; someone who could smooth talk the skin off a rattlesnake, and make pork taste like Kentucky Fried Chicken all in the name of hope and change.
There seem to be a few informal contests in progress. The contests appear to be geared to select the winners of the spending contest in Congress, the lying contest in the MSM arena, and the freedom trampling contest in the Cabinet. Of course, in all these contests, extra points are being awarded for accomplishing these outrageous feats while wearing a straight face.
And, as the MSM surreptitiously changes the scenery between acts, the audience doesn't even notice the doors being locked and the shadowy figures quietly pouring gasoline at the exits.
This post was written in conjunction with a retired LT Col in the USAF.
Here in the US, the vast majority of the citizens know absolutely nothing of the several major threats to our survival. For the most part, the guy, gal, or "other", on the street is so focused on the economic "tree" that he does not see the global economic "forest". It is like a complete idiot facing one huge domino while he wonders what that crashing sound is off in the distance that keeps getting louder. He has a warm fuzzy feeling because he thinks he is being well served by the new resident of the White House. And that graphic picture holds true for, not just the economic frailty, but the country's susceptibility to a Mexican debacle, or a Muslim terrorist attack. Few people have bothered to think through the scenarios far enough to see what an
Israeli attack on Iran could do within hours, or a day or two, here. And as to the rape of the Constitution, and the socialization of the country by big government takeovers and expanded meddling, the citizens are mental paraplegics molded by an educational system designed to make them fat, dumb and happy in their stupidity.
Psychologically, like a group of sheep being fattened on green grass, we have taken totally for granted, the availability of food, water, electricity, gas and entertainment from the "idiot box". For the most part, few remember, with any clarity, the initial chaos of 9/11, the attack on the Pentagon and the uncertainty as to who the attackers really were. Now, we have people in power who will use a similar crisis to their advantage very quickly. Whether it be by emergency powers, martial law, or confiscation of firearms, they are willing to make the crisis work toward the fulfillment of their satanic agenda. Yes, the
children will run in a panic to "daddy" for protection, not even seeing the ax he holds behind his back.
On the other hand, you have every Israeli citizen ready, at a moment's notice, to do their part in a well-rehearsed and clearly prepared plan for survival. What a difference it makes when your very existence is at stake.
This country badly needs an attitude adjustment. Unfortunately, those who should be reporting on the possible consequences of these several scenarios, are still dancing with the prom king, who was elected by an ignorant student body who thought it would be cool to have someone a "little different" as Prom King; someone who could smooth talk the skin off a rattlesnake, and make pork taste like Kentucky Fried Chicken all in the name of hope and change.
There seem to be a few informal contests in progress. The contests appear to be geared to select the winners of the spending contest in Congress, the lying contest in the MSM arena, and the freedom trampling contest in the Cabinet. Of course, in all these contests, extra points are being awarded for accomplishing these outrageous feats while wearing a straight face.
And, as the MSM surreptitiously changes the scenery between acts, the audience doesn't even notice the doors being locked and the shadowy figures quietly pouring gasoline at the exits.
This post was written in conjunction with a retired LT Col in the USAF.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Th Real Story Behind BO and The Pirate Stand-Off
From a reader:
Having spoken to some SEAL pals in Virginia Beach asking why this thing dragged out for 4 days, I got the following:
1. BHO wouldn't authorize the DEVGRU/NSWC SEAL teams to the scene for 36 hours going against OSC (on scene commander) recommendation.
2. Once they arrived, BHO imposed restrictions on their ROE that they couldn't do anything unless the hostage's life was in "imminent" danger
3. The first time the hostage jumped, the SEALS had the raggies all sighted in, but could not fire due to ROE restriction
4. When the navy RIB came under fire as it approached with supplies, no fire was returned due to ROE restrictions. As the raggies were shooting at the RIB, they were exposed and the SEALS had them all dialed in.
5. BHO specifically denied two rescue plans developed by the Bainbridge CPN and SEAL teams
6. Bainbridge CPN and SEAL team CDR finally decide they have the OpArea and OSC authority to solely determine risk to hostage. 4 hours later, 3 dead raggies
7. BHO immediately claims credit for his "daring and decisive" behaviour. As usual with him, it's BS.
Read the following accurate account.
Philips’ first leap into the warm, dark water of the Indian Ocean hadn’t worked out as well. With the Bainbridge in range and a rescue by his country’s Navy possible, Philips threw himself off of his lifeboat prison, enabling Navy shooters onboard the destroyer a clear shot at his captors — and none was taken.
The guidance from National Command Authority — the president of the United States, Barack Obama — had been clear: a peaceful solution was the only acceptable outcome to this standoff unless the hostage’s life was in clear, extreme danger.
The next day, a small Navy boat approaching the floating raft was fired on by the Somali pirates — and again no fire was returned and no pirates killed. This was again due to the cautious stance assumed by Navy personnel thanks to the combination of a lack of clear guidance from Washington and a mandate
from the commander in chief’s staff not to act until Obama, a man with no background of dealing with such issues and no track record of decisiveness, decided that any outcome other than a “peaceful solution” would be acceptable.
After taking fire from the Somali kidnappers again Saturday night, the on scene commander decided he’d had enough. Keeping his authority to act in the case of a clear and present danger to the hostage’s life and having heard nothing from Washington since yet another request to mount a rescue operation had been denied the day before, the Navy officer — unnamed in all media reports to date — decided
the AK47 one captor had leveled at Philips’ back was a threat to the hostage’s life and ordered the NSWC team to take their s hots.
Three rounds downrange later, all three brigands became enemy KIA and Philips was safe. There is upside, downside, and spinside to the series of events over the last week that culminated in the dramatic rescue of an American hostage.
Almost immediately following word of the rescue, the Obama administration and its supporters claimed victory against pirates in the Indian Ocean and [1] declared that the dramatic end to the standoff put to rest questions of the inexperienced president’s toughness and decisiveness.
Despite the Obama administration’s (and its sycophants’) attempt to spin the success as a result of bold, decisive leadership by the inexperienced president, the reality is nothing of the sort. What should have been a standoff lasting only hours — as long as it took the USS Bainbridge and its team of NSWC operators to steam to the location — became an embarrassing four day and counting standoff between a ragtag handful of criminals with rifles and a U.S. Navy warship.
Having spoken to some SEAL pals in Virginia Beach asking why this thing dragged out for 4 days, I got the following:
1. BHO wouldn't authorize the DEVGRU/NSWC SEAL teams to the scene for 36 hours going against OSC (on scene commander) recommendation.
2. Once they arrived, BHO imposed restrictions on their ROE that they couldn't do anything unless the hostage's life was in "imminent" danger
3. The first time the hostage jumped, the SEALS had the raggies all sighted in, but could not fire due to ROE restriction
4. When the navy RIB came under fire as it approached with supplies, no fire was returned due to ROE restrictions. As the raggies were shooting at the RIB, they were exposed and the SEALS had them all dialed in.
5. BHO specifically denied two rescue plans developed by the Bainbridge CPN and SEAL teams
6. Bainbridge CPN and SEAL team CDR finally decide they have the OpArea and OSC authority to solely determine risk to hostage. 4 hours later, 3 dead raggies
7. BHO immediately claims credit for his "daring and decisive" behaviour. As usual with him, it's BS.
Read the following accurate account.
Philips’ first leap into the warm, dark water of the Indian Ocean hadn’t worked out as well. With the Bainbridge in range and a rescue by his country’s Navy possible, Philips threw himself off of his lifeboat prison, enabling Navy shooters onboard the destroyer a clear shot at his captors — and none was taken.
The guidance from National Command Authority — the president of the United States, Barack Obama — had been clear: a peaceful solution was the only acceptable outcome to this standoff unless the hostage’s life was in clear, extreme danger.
The next day, a small Navy boat approaching the floating raft was fired on by the Somali pirates — and again no fire was returned and no pirates killed. This was again due to the cautious stance assumed by Navy personnel thanks to the combination of a lack of clear guidance from Washington and a mandate
from the commander in chief’s staff not to act until Obama, a man with no background of dealing with such issues and no track record of decisiveness, decided that any outcome other than a “peaceful solution” would be acceptable.
After taking fire from the Somali kidnappers again Saturday night, the on scene commander decided he’d had enough. Keeping his authority to act in the case of a clear and present danger to the hostage’s life and having heard nothing from Washington since yet another request to mount a rescue operation had been denied the day before, the Navy officer — unnamed in all media reports to date — decided
the AK47 one captor had leveled at Philips’ back was a threat to the hostage’s life and ordered the NSWC team to take their s hots.
Three rounds downrange later, all three brigands became enemy KIA and Philips was safe. There is upside, downside, and spinside to the series of events over the last week that culminated in the dramatic rescue of an American hostage.
Almost immediately following word of the rescue, the Obama administration and its supporters claimed victory against pirates in the Indian Ocean and [1] declared that the dramatic end to the standoff put to rest questions of the inexperienced president’s toughness and decisiveness.
Despite the Obama administration’s (and its sycophants’) attempt to spin the success as a result of bold, decisive leadership by the inexperienced president, the reality is nothing of the sort. What should have been a standoff lasting only hours — as long as it took the USS Bainbridge and its team of NSWC operators to steam to the location — became an embarrassing four day and counting standoff between a ragtag handful of criminals with rifles and a U.S. Navy warship.
Friday, April 17, 2009
The American Standard
Superb speech given at the Norman OK Tea Party on 4.15.09.
THE AMERICAN STANDARD
BY JACOB F. ROECKER
Delivered in Norman Oklahoma 15 April 2009 6:00pm
In this country we look forward, because forward is the only direction to move. A few weeks ago we were looking forward, and the only people we saw moving in the same direction were the people to our sides. The people who believe the word “citizen” means something.
I’m grateful right now across our nation we can look up and see the stars and stripes flying. It’s there because brave Americans in our past, and brave Americans today, die to keep it there. They give their lives, and gift to us an unparalleled freedom and prosperity in the history of the world. It seems we can always look to our Soldiers as examples of the best America has to offer, and where do they turn? Which direction do they face? When times get toughest, what is it that they look to?
You shouldn’t be surprised to know that throughout history Soldiers have looked to a piece of cloth. Sometimes called a guidon, sometimes called “the colors,” and sometimes called a “standard.” Rallying around the standard in times of confusion gave Soldiers safety in numbers and a better chance to forge victory out of the threatening chaos before them.
I ask now, what is our standard? Our nation was forged in a time of war and needed a standard to turn to. Good citizens gathered and created a congress. The congress created their standard, built upon everything they had learned from the past. They needed to present their case clearly before all mankind and created: The Declaration of Independence. At the end of the document we read the words “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”
When representing the people really mattered it required the pledge of your lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. This pledge was the patriot standard. But I say that good representation has always mattered. It will matter in my children’s generation, and it matters now. The standard in this country for representation is total dedication. Nothing they had was too important they were not willing to give it for this country.
There have been many conclusions drawn from that document and their actions in signing it. I would like to offer this conclusion for our generation. That selflessness in pledging your sacred honor is the standard of public service for the patriot generation that blessed this land over 230 years ago. It is the standard for every public servant from that time forward. It’s time we remind our government that the Patriot Standard should be the American standard.
We need that sort of representation now, but when you ask for it you hear people say things like “they don’t make them like anymore” or “those men were unique in all of history” and “we’ll never see men like that again.” I’d like to think that every generation of citizens has within its population the greatness of our founding fathers. If they could manage to find such patriots among a population of 2 million people than how come we can’t find them among a population of 300 million? Has God abandoned the country he has spent so much effort to help create? Would a deity that has openly rewarded the compassion of this nation towards its former enemies abandon us now? Does the argument that he cares less about me and my children than he did about the WWII generation, and the patriot generation hold weight?
NO. I cannot live and believe I have been abandoned. I can live and believe that my voice has been abandoned in government.
When the Boston tea party took place it wasn’t about the money. It was about what the money represented. Today the same logic stands true. Government spending in our generation means that my children and grandchildren’s generation has already been taxed. They bear the weight of this generation.
How did we get here? What’s at the root of it? The root of it is representatives placing agendas above values, placing parties before principles, putting priorities on the political processes external to the constitution. At some point we have been sold a lie and bought it. We have purchased an imitation of quality, and now quality counts.
Now we’re making some noise about it. Now we’re asking of our government “Is this is the best we can do?” Their best isn’t good enough, and instead of shrinking into thinking that is all the country has to offer its time we work together and start demanding more. There are patriots in this generation. We have to find them and put them in office.
I was on the phone with a friend last week who is a political adviser and recently had success in helping a governor get elected to office. I invited him to ask that his next candidate sign a pledge to represent his constituents according to basic principles and values. He said that it was politically too risky. The candidate hadn’t secured the party’s nomination.
Wait a second? Too risky? The possibly future governor of the state, in charge of thousands of uniformed service members that will probably get sent overseas is politically scared to sign a morally binding contract? They are scared to risk their own political career, but are willing to take charge of those willing to take deadly risks. Last time I checked if you didn’t get your party’s nomination you went back to your old job. What happens to the Soldier in Iraq under fire when the person to his right or left is afraid to take risks?
It’s time to get our priorities straight. It’s time someone raise a standard. It’s time this group sends a message to our government officials. We the people lead this nation. The caliber of representation that created this nation is the only caliber that will maintain it.
In order for your rights as citizens to be maintained they must be exercised. Now is the time. You are the right person for the job, and together we can make the Patriot Standard, the American Standard.
Visit 912candidates.org download the letters and postcards and send them in to your officials. Let them know you want your voice to matter. You’d be surprised how many of them have been waiting America to stand up. Today we are standing up. We’re on our feet, and all of us are headed in the same direction, forward.
Jacob Roecker
Citizen, Patriot, Veteran
http://912candidates.org
THE AMERICAN STANDARD
BY JACOB F. ROECKER
Delivered in Norman Oklahoma 15 April 2009 6:00pm
In this country we look forward, because forward is the only direction to move. A few weeks ago we were looking forward, and the only people we saw moving in the same direction were the people to our sides. The people who believe the word “citizen” means something.
I’m grateful right now across our nation we can look up and see the stars and stripes flying. It’s there because brave Americans in our past, and brave Americans today, die to keep it there. They give their lives, and gift to us an unparalleled freedom and prosperity in the history of the world. It seems we can always look to our Soldiers as examples of the best America has to offer, and where do they turn? Which direction do they face? When times get toughest, what is it that they look to?
You shouldn’t be surprised to know that throughout history Soldiers have looked to a piece of cloth. Sometimes called a guidon, sometimes called “the colors,” and sometimes called a “standard.” Rallying around the standard in times of confusion gave Soldiers safety in numbers and a better chance to forge victory out of the threatening chaos before them.
I ask now, what is our standard? Our nation was forged in a time of war and needed a standard to turn to. Good citizens gathered and created a congress. The congress created their standard, built upon everything they had learned from the past. They needed to present their case clearly before all mankind and created: The Declaration of Independence. At the end of the document we read the words “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”
When representing the people really mattered it required the pledge of your lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. This pledge was the patriot standard. But I say that good representation has always mattered. It will matter in my children’s generation, and it matters now. The standard in this country for representation is total dedication. Nothing they had was too important they were not willing to give it for this country.
There have been many conclusions drawn from that document and their actions in signing it. I would like to offer this conclusion for our generation. That selflessness in pledging your sacred honor is the standard of public service for the patriot generation that blessed this land over 230 years ago. It is the standard for every public servant from that time forward. It’s time we remind our government that the Patriot Standard should be the American standard.
We need that sort of representation now, but when you ask for it you hear people say things like “they don’t make them like anymore” or “those men were unique in all of history” and “we’ll never see men like that again.” I’d like to think that every generation of citizens has within its population the greatness of our founding fathers. If they could manage to find such patriots among a population of 2 million people than how come we can’t find them among a population of 300 million? Has God abandoned the country he has spent so much effort to help create? Would a deity that has openly rewarded the compassion of this nation towards its former enemies abandon us now? Does the argument that he cares less about me and my children than he did about the WWII generation, and the patriot generation hold weight?
NO. I cannot live and believe I have been abandoned. I can live and believe that my voice has been abandoned in government.
When the Boston tea party took place it wasn’t about the money. It was about what the money represented. Today the same logic stands true. Government spending in our generation means that my children and grandchildren’s generation has already been taxed. They bear the weight of this generation.
How did we get here? What’s at the root of it? The root of it is representatives placing agendas above values, placing parties before principles, putting priorities on the political processes external to the constitution. At some point we have been sold a lie and bought it. We have purchased an imitation of quality, and now quality counts.
Now we’re making some noise about it. Now we’re asking of our government “Is this is the best we can do?” Their best isn’t good enough, and instead of shrinking into thinking that is all the country has to offer its time we work together and start demanding more. There are patriots in this generation. We have to find them and put them in office.
I was on the phone with a friend last week who is a political adviser and recently had success in helping a governor get elected to office. I invited him to ask that his next candidate sign a pledge to represent his constituents according to basic principles and values. He said that it was politically too risky. The candidate hadn’t secured the party’s nomination.
Wait a second? Too risky? The possibly future governor of the state, in charge of thousands of uniformed service members that will probably get sent overseas is politically scared to sign a morally binding contract? They are scared to risk their own political career, but are willing to take charge of those willing to take deadly risks. Last time I checked if you didn’t get your party’s nomination you went back to your old job. What happens to the Soldier in Iraq under fire when the person to his right or left is afraid to take risks?
It’s time to get our priorities straight. It’s time someone raise a standard. It’s time this group sends a message to our government officials. We the people lead this nation. The caliber of representation that created this nation is the only caliber that will maintain it.
In order for your rights as citizens to be maintained they must be exercised. Now is the time. You are the right person for the job, and together we can make the Patriot Standard, the American Standard.
Visit 912candidates.org download the letters and postcards and send them in to your officials. Let them know you want your voice to matter. You’d be surprised how many of them have been waiting America to stand up. Today we are standing up. We’re on our feet, and all of us are headed in the same direction, forward.
Jacob Roecker
Citizen, Patriot, Veteran
http://912candidates.org
Quote of the Day
The few who look forward, while always knocking on new doors, no matter how futile it may seem or how insignificant their progress, will carry the many who just keep waiting for things to get better.
And the few will "suddenly" become overnight legends within their families, 'hoods, and countries, while having the most fun, with the most friends, at the most after-parties.
Win/Win, baby -
The Universe
And the few will "suddenly" become overnight legends within their families, 'hoods, and countries, while having the most fun, with the most friends, at the most after-parties.
Win/Win, baby -
The Universe
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Tea Party Rocks Rhode Island
Stimulated to protest
Yesterday was an historic day in Rhode Island and across America. People from all walks of life came out with enthusiasm to tell their elected leaders that they have had ENOUGH! I am overwhelmed by the response. We will not stop. This is the beginning of something big!
08:51 AM EDT on Thursday, April 16, 2009
By Philip Marcelo
Journal Staff Writer
Protestors with signs and flags turn out to the State House Wednesday afternoon to protest taxes and what they see as excessive government spending at the state and federal levels. Similar rallies were held nationwide.
The Providence Journal / Bob Breidenbach
PROVIDENCE — At least 2,000 people rallied Wednesday in front of the State House to protest the unprecedented level of federal spending to help overcome the recession.
For those who took off work to come downtown on a sunny but windy afternoon, it was a way of saying that the country is moving in the wrong direction. That government is growing too big, too fast. That too much is being spent that will have to be borne by future generations.
“It’s unconscionable to have to send this bill to our grandchildren,” said Marcia Camp, a retired librarian from Scituate who held up a sign saying “Save Trees, Stop Printing $$.”
See the full article with video and photos here.
Yesterday was an historic day in Rhode Island and across America. People from all walks of life came out with enthusiasm to tell their elected leaders that they have had ENOUGH! I am overwhelmed by the response. We will not stop. This is the beginning of something big!
08:51 AM EDT on Thursday, April 16, 2009
By Philip Marcelo
Journal Staff Writer
Protestors with signs and flags turn out to the State House Wednesday afternoon to protest taxes and what they see as excessive government spending at the state and federal levels. Similar rallies were held nationwide.
The Providence Journal / Bob Breidenbach
PROVIDENCE — At least 2,000 people rallied Wednesday in front of the State House to protest the unprecedented level of federal spending to help overcome the recession.
For those who took off work to come downtown on a sunny but windy afternoon, it was a way of saying that the country is moving in the wrong direction. That government is growing too big, too fast. That too much is being spent that will have to be borne by future generations.
“It’s unconscionable to have to send this bill to our grandchildren,” said Marcia Camp, a retired librarian from Scituate who held up a sign saying “Save Trees, Stop Printing $$.”
See the full article with video and photos here.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Bailouts for Beach House Owners
What are the loony bins in Congress going to come up with next? Are they living in an alternate reality? Quietly slipped into the Climate Bill is a provision for those who "suffer" from climate change to sue the federal government or private businesses. Because we have so much money to hand out to poor beach house owners. We mustn't let them suffer needlessly.
EXCLUSIVE: Climate bill could trigger lawsuit landslide
Allows action from those 'expected to suffer'
By Tom LoBianco (Contact) | Friday, April 10, 2009
Self-proclaimed victims of global warming or those who "expect to suffer" from it - from beachfront property owners to asthmatics - for the first time would be able to sue the federal government or private businesses over greenhouse gas emissions under a little-noticed provision slipped into the House climate bill.
Environmentalists say the measure was narrowly crafted to give citizens the unusual standing to sue the U.S. government as a way to force action on curbing emissions. But the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sees a new cottage industry for lawyers.
Read the rest here...
EXCLUSIVE: Climate bill could trigger lawsuit landslide
Allows action from those 'expected to suffer'
By Tom LoBianco (Contact) | Friday, April 10, 2009
Self-proclaimed victims of global warming or those who "expect to suffer" from it - from beachfront property owners to asthmatics - for the first time would be able to sue the federal government or private businesses over greenhouse gas emissions under a little-noticed provision slipped into the House climate bill.
Environmentalists say the measure was narrowly crafted to give citizens the unusual standing to sue the U.S. government as a way to force action on curbing emissions. But the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sees a new cottage industry for lawyers.
Read the rest here...
Obama Firsts
1. His first phone call was to Abbas, the terrorist leader of the Palestinian Authority and al Fatah;
2. His first interview was on al-Arabiya News Channel, where he apologized for the United States;
3. His first appointment of an envoy to Syria was George Soros;
4. He bankrolled Hamas out of Whitehouse funds to the tune of $23 million, following Israel's invasion of Gaza to stop the missile strikes;
5. He promised another $900 million to Gaza;
6. He immediately adopted the Saudi Plan as policy for Israel, which favors a contiguous Palestinian state (that is, a geographic area that connects Gaza with the West Bank and includes Jerusalem - necessarily dividing Israel);
7. He dismissed charges against the perpetrators of the bombing of the USS Cole;
8. He announced the shut-down of Gitmo, and apologized to the Islamic world for its existence;
9. He announced that his first summit would be an Islamic summit;
10. He turned a blind eye to Iran's launch of a satellite capable of triangulating coordinates for ICBMs, a capability Iran is furiously trying to develop for the delivery of nuclear weapons;
11. He turned a blind eye to the release of A. Q. Khan, Pakistan's top nuclear scientist, who is believed to be the very person to have delivered nuclear bomb technology to North Korea;
12. He intends to eliminate our anti-ballistic missile defense program;
13. He intends to reduce our nuclear weapons arsenal by 75%;
14. He intends to reduce our military budget by 25% - openly announced on televised news.
15. He has reneged on developing nuclear power; (increasing dependence on foreign energy)
16. He continues to block off-shore or expanded on-shore drilling; (increasing dependence on foreign energy)
17. He continues to try and block the production of coal (45% of our electric generating capability)
18. He referred to America as an "arrogant nation" and apologized while speaking before Iraqi's in Baghdad.
19. He stated that America is not a nation based on Christian values...but a nation of 'ideals' during the G-20 European tour.
20. He verbally committed the US banking industry to adhere to international regulations and oversight.
21. And the piece de resistance - he actually bowed to a Saudi King. In the muslim world that is a gesture of submission and deference. Obama did not do this when he met Queen Elizabeth, he shook her hand. But he BOWS to King Abdullah. King Abdullah DID NOT bow back - 'nuff said.
What else will this traitorous charlatan do to destroy us? Its only been 3 months !!!
2. His first interview was on al-Arabiya News Channel, where he apologized for the United States;
3. His first appointment of an envoy to Syria was George Soros;
4. He bankrolled Hamas out of Whitehouse funds to the tune of $23 million, following Israel's invasion of Gaza to stop the missile strikes;
5. He promised another $900 million to Gaza;
6. He immediately adopted the Saudi Plan as policy for Israel, which favors a contiguous Palestinian state (that is, a geographic area that connects Gaza with the West Bank and includes Jerusalem - necessarily dividing Israel);
7. He dismissed charges against the perpetrators of the bombing of the USS Cole;
8. He announced the shut-down of Gitmo, and apologized to the Islamic world for its existence;
9. He announced that his first summit would be an Islamic summit;
10. He turned a blind eye to Iran's launch of a satellite capable of triangulating coordinates for ICBMs, a capability Iran is furiously trying to develop for the delivery of nuclear weapons;
11. He turned a blind eye to the release of A. Q. Khan, Pakistan's top nuclear scientist, who is believed to be the very person to have delivered nuclear bomb technology to North Korea;
12. He intends to eliminate our anti-ballistic missile defense program;
13. He intends to reduce our nuclear weapons arsenal by 75%;
14. He intends to reduce our military budget by 25% - openly announced on televised news.
15. He has reneged on developing nuclear power; (increasing dependence on foreign energy)
16. He continues to block off-shore or expanded on-shore drilling; (increasing dependence on foreign energy)
17. He continues to try and block the production of coal (45% of our electric generating capability)
18. He referred to America as an "arrogant nation" and apologized while speaking before Iraqi's in Baghdad.
19. He stated that America is not a nation based on Christian values...but a nation of 'ideals' during the G-20 European tour.
20. He verbally committed the US banking industry to adhere to international regulations and oversight.
21. And the piece de resistance - he actually bowed to a Saudi King. In the muslim world that is a gesture of submission and deference. Obama did not do this when he met Queen Elizabeth, he shook her hand. But he BOWS to King Abdullah. King Abdullah DID NOT bow back - 'nuff said.
What else will this traitorous charlatan do to destroy us? Its only been 3 months !!!
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Here We Go, Down the Rabbit Hole
Do you sometimes feel like you are in Alice in Wonderland, moving through an inexplicably strange new world run by nuts? Every day there is some news that knocks me off my seat and I think "This has got to be a dream. This can't really be happening". But it is happening, and nobody is doing anything to stop it. Just like Alice, America is shrinking, shrinking, shrinking, and away we go, down the rabbit hole .
"The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency
The world is a step closer to a global currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all humanity.
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
A single clause in Point 19 of the communiqué issued by the G20 leaders amounts to revolution in the global financial order.
"We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity," it said. SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century.
In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.
It has been a good summit for the IMF. Its fighting fund for crises is to be tripled overnight to $750bn. This is real money.
Read the rest HERE.
"The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency
The world is a step closer to a global currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all humanity.
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
A single clause in Point 19 of the communiqué issued by the G20 leaders amounts to revolution in the global financial order.
"We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity," it said. SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century.
In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.
It has been a good summit for the IMF. Its fighting fund for crises is to be tripled overnight to $750bn. This is real money.
Read the rest HERE.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
Obama Gives Away Our Economic Rights in Europe
Sorry I have not posted in days, but I have been busy organizing the Providence Tax Day Tea Party, part of the Nationwide Tax Day Tea Party on April 15th. We anticipate this will be the largest multi-city protest in American history! Be sure to sign up for a tea party in your area at http://taxdayteaparty.com
Now for some sobering news from the G-20. Dick Morris explains here how Obama gave up US economic sovereignty, without any input from the American people in his trip to Europe. How is it that he was able to give away our rights? Check here.
Now for some sobering news from the G-20. Dick Morris explains here how Obama gave up US economic sovereignty, without any input from the American people in his trip to Europe. How is it that he was able to give away our rights? Check here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
